The Raiders Aren’t the Worst Run Franchise in Pro Football
Wednesday, January 21st, 2009Ask a fan who the NFL’s worst owner is. Or what franchise is run most poorly. 90 percent of those you ask will probably respond Al Davis and the Oakland Raiders.
But I have to wonder, are they really right?
I won’t counterargue the opinion Al Davis seems senile at times and his decisions seem to have no rhyme or reason and the Raiders are in deep trouble with him calling the shots and hiring head coaches. But let’s make one thing perfectly clear: his hasn’t been the worst franchise the past decade.
The Detroit Lions, who most recently became the first team in NFL history to finish a season with an 0-16 record (interestingly, one season after the New England Patriots became the first to finish 16-0), haven’t been to the postseason since 1999. Say what you will about Al Davis and how he runs the Oakland Raiders but while the Lions have been enjoying 4th place in the NFC North (and prior to that, Central), Davis’s Raiders have won a Super Bowl and gone to the postseason three times. Granted, they haven’t played in January since 2002, but the point is this: if the measurement of a franchise’s success is wins or postseason berths or Super Bowls, Davis’s Raiders have more in the last ten years.
You can blame Matt Millen and the philosophies he brought to the franchise, but at some point it comes back to the owner and higher ups who employed Matt Millen and even extended his contract after far too many consecutive losing seasons. It’s led to a dramatic downfall, best summarized by saying the team hasn’t had an identity since the days of Barry Sanders. In 2007 things completely unraveled after Jon Kitna guaranteed 10 wins and collapsed alongside his teammates while the Lions dropped seven of its final eight games.
Of course the Lions fired Millen during the 2008 season, but it’s too little too late. The Lions don’t have the personnel to rise above any of its division rivals, and agreeing to coach the Lions may wind up a worse decision than Schwartz hoped. Because he’s walking into a messy situation and given the NFL’s treatment of head coaches, Schwartz may only be given three seasons to show serious progress. While it’s not particularly difficult to improve on last season winless record, it may be difficult to get the Lions up to where they’ll need to be so he’s not fired.
It doesn’t matter how you slice it; the Lions have been mishandled for a long time now. Are they the worst run franchise in pro football? Yeah, I think the argument could be made. While I’m hardly a fan of Al Davis and his antics, it’s a little frustrating to read editorials criticizing him as the NFL’s worst owner and fans complain the Raiders can’t have success while he’s in charge. Let’s all remember how the Lions have done lately under the watch of William Ford, who’s owned Detroit longer than Al Davis has owned Oakland and it’s time to consider how many rings the Lions since he bought the franchise in 1964: 0.

